Nearly two weeks after India and Pakistan reached an uneasy cease-fire, neither New Delhi nor Islamabad agree on what ...

Something fundamental has changed. India has set a new threshold: It will no longer absorb attacks without a kinetic response ...

Yet, the danger of nuclear war remains "relatively small" between India and Pakistan, according to Mr Clary. "So long as ...

The U.S. needs to set an example for the rest of the world by taking our nuclear missiles off hair-trigger alert and ...

The fast-moving conflict between India and Pakistan last week demonstrated the inherent dangers of the modern nuclear age.

During the 1999 Kargil War, Pakistan's then-foreign secretary ... wrote in his memoir that Pompeo overstated both the risk of nuclear escalation and the US role in calming the conflict in 2019.

I have been following India-Pakistan now for 30 years and the sight of two nuclear-armed states barraging each other with ...

Dhillon explained that while India, which is far bigger in size compared to Pakistan, has the depth to absorb a nuclear attack, the neighbouring country will be annihilated if it India strikes back.

Conventional wars are basically wars of attrition, which means Pakistan would almost certainly lose a non-nuclear conflict. By contrast, both countries would be destroyed in a nuclear war ...