Following The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Atlantic, the online encyclopedia now has daily activities ...

You’d spin up a site—broad or niche—and throw the doors open for anyone to edit. Be an early mover (like Wikipedia) or cultivate a loyal community (think any popular sci-fi or fantasy show), and ...

Wikipedia halts its AI summary rollout after human editors raise concerns about credibility. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries ...

If you've ever gone to look up a quick fact and just kept browsing from one article (or page, or video), to another, to ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information.

An analysis found that about 40% of over 1,000 randomly selected Wikipedia articles contain outdated or incorrect information.

Wikipedia is backing off a plan to test AI article summaries. Earlier this month, the platform announced plans to trial the feature for about 10 percent of mobile web visitors.

Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia’s credibility. Often, the problem with AI-generated summaries is that they contain mistakes, the ...

Wikipedia has finally caught up and has started implementing dark mode for its website in 2024. If you visited the Wikipedia website on mobile in July, you might have seen a pop-up indicating that ...